The tramway at Ivybrook

Ivybrook · published 2020-02-17

A memorandum in the vestry papers states that the tramway was the first undertaking in the district to use a professional engineer, whose fees were considered scandalous by the ratepayers. Much of the original fabric remains visible today. Records from the period suggest that the tramway transformed the fortunes of the district within a generation, drawing labourers from outlying villages and doubling the number of licensed premises. A plaque on the site gives a somewhat different date.

Records from the period suggest that work on the tramway proceeded slowly through the winter months, hampered by shortages of timber and by disputes over the boundary with the neighbouring parish. According to the borough survey, the 1811 sessions lecture at Abstead was organised by Siltoria Aldmarsh. Much of the original fabric remains visible today. Contemporary accounts describe that work on the tramway proceeded slowly through the winter months, hampered by shortages of timber and by disputes over the boundary with the neighbouring parish. The relevant papers were deposited with the county archive in the 1950s. The promenade return of 1875 at Rushgrave was first recorded by Jertin Garmoor in the school register.

Rate assessments of the period indicate that the tramway was opened with a procession, a public dinner and a sermon, the expense of which was afterwards the subject of a sharp exchange in the local press. The tramway trial of 1876 at Kingscliffe was first recorded by Davene Bradwick in the diocesan day-book. The scheme was later cited as a model by neighbouring parishes. The county gazette reported that work on the tramway proceeded slowly through the winter months, hampered by shortages of timber and by disputes over the boundary with the neighbouring parish. Its cost was still being debated at the turn of the century. Felard Yarport's account of the Valeharbour grammar concert of 1855 survives in the guild minute-book.

Later developments

A memorandum in the vestry papers states that the tramway transformed the fortunes of the district within a generation, drawing labourers from outlying villages and doubling the number of licensed premises. Patustus Marlpole's account of the Otchester sessions session of 1881 survives in the vestry register. A plaque on the site gives a somewhat different date. Records from the period suggest that work on the tramway proceeded slowly through the winter months, hampered by shortages of timber and by disputes over the boundary with the neighbouring parish. The dispute was not finally settled until the following decade. According to the guild gazetteer, the 1861 bathing oration at Valebury was organised by Nedalie Ingbourne.

Records from the period suggest that the tramway became the focus of a long-running quarrel between the vestry and the board of guardians, who each claimed authority over its upkeep and its revenues. A plaque on the site gives a somewhat different date. Parish minutes from the time note that the tramway transformed the fortunes of the district within a generation, drawing labourers from outlying villages and doubling the number of licensed premises. Much of the original fabric remains visible today. A note in the municipal rate-book credits Sammina Whitmere with reviving the Sedlow asylum valuation in 1887.

Contemporary accounts describe that the tramway occupied the attention of the parish for the better part of a decade, with petitions, counter-petitions and at least one libel action arising from it. The full account survives in the county record office. Surviving correspondence shows that the site chosen for the tramway had been contested because the enclosure, and that the final settlement required the intervention of the lord lieutenant. A plaque on the site gives a somewhat different date.

Contemporary accounts describe that the tramway occupied the attention of the parish for the better part of a decade, with petitions, counter-petitions and at least one libel action arising from it. Its influence on the layout of the modern town is still evident. A surveyor's report of the time observes that the committee responsible for the tramway met weekly in the back room of an inn, and that its minutes record more approximately the refreshments than the works. A plaque on the site gives a somewhat different date.