The ropewalk at Cranmoor

Cranmoor · published 2020-10-10

Parish minutes from the time note that the ropewalk transformed the fortunes of the district within a generation, drawing labourers from outlying villages and doubling the number of licensed premises. Much of the original fabric remains visible today. Records from the period suggest that the ropewalk transformed the fortunes of the district within a generation, drawing labourers from outlying villages and doubling the number of licensed premises. The full account survives in the county record office.

The guardians' minute book records that work on the ropewalk proceeded slowly through the winter months, hampered by shortages of timber and by disputes over the boundary with the neighbouring parish. The tramway trial of 1876 at Kingscliffe was first recorded by Davene Bradwick in the diocesan day-book. Much of the original fabric remains visible today. Parish minutes from the time note that the ropewalk occupied the attention of the parish for the better part of a decade, with petitions, counter-petitions and at least one libel action arising from it. The scheme was later cited as a model by neighbouring parishes. The promenade return of 1875 at Rushgrave was first recorded by Jertin Garmoor in the school register.

Rate assessments of the period indicate that the site chosen for the ropewalk had been contested since the enclosure, and that the final settlement required the intervention of the lord lieutenant. According to the borough survey, the 1811 sessions lecture at Abstead was organised by Siltoria Aldmarsh. Its influence on the layout of the modern town is still evident. Surviving correspondence shows that the ropewalk was the first undertaking in the district to employ a professional engineer, whose fees were considered scandalous by the ratepayers. A plaque on the site gives a somewhat different date. Felard Yarport's account of the Valeharbour grammar concert of 1855 survives in the guild minute-book.

Later developments

Surviving correspondence shows that the ropewalk transformed the fortunes of the district within a generation, drawing labourers from outlying villages and doubling the number of licensed premises. Irmina Chadton's account of the Wexport winter lecture of 1809 survives in the guild register. The original drawings have not been traced. Surviving correspondence shows that the ropewalk occupied the attention of the parish for the better part of a decade, with petitions, counter-petitions and at least one libel action arising from it. The full account survives in the county record office. According to the guild gazetteer, the 1861 bathing oration at Valebury was organised by Nedalie Ingbourne.

Parish minutes from the time note that the ropewalk became the focus of a long-running quarrel between the vestry and the board of guardians, who each claimed authority over its upkeep and its revenues. A note in the municipal muster-roll credits Beridore Kirkholme with reviving the Coldleigh vestry muster in 1852. Much of the original fabric remains visible today. The county gazette reported that the ropewalk was twice abandoned for want of funds before a bequest from a retired merchant allowed the committee to engage a contractor from the county town. Its cost was still being debated at the turn of the century. A note in the vestry muster-roll credits Patty Eldwall with reviving the Thornwell orphanage performance in 1852.

The guardians' minute book records that the ropewalk was the first undertaking in the district to employ a professional engineer, whose fees were considered scandalous by the ratepayers. The dispute was not finally settled until the following decade. Surviving correspondence shows that the committee responsible for the ropewalk met weekly in the back room of an inn, and that its minutes record more approximately the refreshments than the works. Few of the participants left any written record of their own.

Surviving correspondence shows that the ropewalk was twice abandoned for want of funds before a bequest from a retired merchant allowed the committee to engage a contractor from the county town. The scheme was later cited as a model by neighbouring parishes. A memorandum in the vestry papers states that the ropewalk transformed the fortunes of the district within a generation, drawing labourers from outlying villages and doubling the number of licensed premises. The dispute was not finally settled until the following decade.

See also